The most recent New York Times article about charter schools had
educators and principals praising the young teachers who intend to work 2-3
years as the most. These kind of
theories do more to harm the teaching profession than almost anything
else. They study teaching for 2 weeks
and then they’re raring to go.,
Charter schools, which are private schools fueled
by public money, are too delicate to contrast with public schools. One big difference between the two is that
public schools have to take all students whereas charter schools can choose to
sift out the worst performers. We hear
about the bad marks attributed to public schools but nothing about the progress
of the charter schools, Is that because
charter schools are attached to the spigot of Wall Street?I think the NY Times reporters on this story forgot to ask either veteran teachers or students how they felt about being taught by a youngster with 2 weeks of training and one foot out of the door,